Back to Glossary
Last Updated: February 8, 2025 4:43 pm
by Aaron Winston

Adjudication

A legal process where a judge, arbitrator, or decision-maker evaluates evidence and arguments to determine parties’ rights and obligations.

A wooden judge's gavel striking a base with intense force, causing the wood to shatter, symbolizing the power of legal adjudication and decision-making.

Keypoints

Adjudication is the formal legal process of resolving disputes and determining legal rights and obligations. It involves a neutral authority—such as a judge, arbitrator, or tribunal—reviewing evidence and issuing a legally binding decision. Adjudication differs from arbitration and mediation in that it follows a formal legal procedure and results in an enforceable ruling. It is used in various legal contexts, including civil lawsuits, criminal cases, administrative hearings, and insurance disputes. The process typically includes filing a claim, gathering evidence, hearings, legal review, and a final decision, which may be subject to appeal. The timeframe for adjudication varies based on the complexity of the case, with some disputes resolved in months while others take years. Legal representation is often beneficial, especially in complex cases involving significant financial stakes.

Keypoints

  • Definition: A formal legal process for resolving disputes and determining rights and obligations.
  • Differences from ADR: Adjudication results in a binding decision, while arbitration and mediation offer alternative resolutions.
  • Legal Contexts: Used in civil, criminal, administrative, and insurance cases.
  • Process: Filing a claim, evidence collection, hearings, legal review, decision, and possible appeals.
  • Decision-Makers: Judges (court cases), hearing officers (administrative cases), and arbitrators (private dispute resolution).
  • Timeframes: Ranges from months (small claims) to years (complex or criminal cases).
  • Importance of Legal Representation: Lawyers can help navigate complex adjudication processes and improve outcomes.
Primary Content Category:
Law & Government > Legal (Confidence: 0.98)
Secondary Content Category:
Reference Materials > Dictionaries & Encyclopedias (Confidence: 0.85)
Relevant Keywords:
adjudication, legal definition, law dictionary, legal terms, legal vocabulary, adjudication process, legal proceedings, dispute resolution, court decisions, judgment
Relevant Hashtags:
#LegalTerms, #LawDictionary, #LegalVocabulary
Additional Insight:

This page provides a definition of “adjudication” within a legal context. The target audience includes law students, legal professionals, and anyone seeking to understand legal terminology. Understanding legal vocabulary is fundamental to navigating the legal system.

Adjudication is the formal legal process used to resolve disputes and determine legal rights and obligations.

Whether in civil lawsuits, criminal cases, or administrative hearings, adjudication ensures that a neutral authority—such as a judge or tribunal—reviews evidence and issues a binding decision.

Understanding how the adjudication process works can help individuals and businesses navigate legal disputes effectively.

Adjudication is the formal legal process of resolving a dispute or determining rights and obligations under the law. It involves a judge, arbitrator, or other legal authority reviewing evidence, hearing arguments, and making a binding decision.

Adjudication is used in various legal contexts, including civil, criminal, and administrative cases.

How does adjudication differ from arbitration and mediation?

  • Adjudication is a legally binding decision made by a judge or designated authority.
  • Arbitration is a private dispute resolution method where a neutral third-party arbitrator issues a binding or non-binding decision.
  • Mediation is a voluntary negotiation process facilitated by a neutral mediator, where the parties try to reach a mutual agreement rather than having a decision imposed upon them.

The key difference is that adjudication is a formal legal ruling, while arbitration and mediation are alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, often used to avoid court proceedings.

Adjudication Definition: The legal process of resolving a dispute or deciding a case.

What is the difference between adjudication and arbitration?

Adjudication and arbitration are both legal processes used to resolve disputes, but they differ in formality, authority, and enforcement. 

  • Adjudication is a formal legal ruling issued by a court or tribunal, while arbitration is a private dispute resolution method that allows parties to choose their decision-maker and process. 
  • Arbitration is generally faster and more flexible, but adjudication provides stronger legal enforcement and broader appeal rights.

Is adjudication the same as a trial?

No, adjudication is not necessarily the same as a trial, though it can involve court proceedings.

  • Trials are formal legal proceedings where a judge (and sometimes a jury) hears evidence and arguments before issuing a verdict.
  • Adjudication can occur outside of a courtroom, such as in administrative hearings, arbitration panels, or agency rulings.

In summary, all trials involve adjudication, but not all adjudications require a trial.

What are the main steps in the adjudication process?

  1. Filing a Claim or Dispute – A party initiates the process by filing a legal complaint or application.
  2. Notice and Response – The opposing party is notified and given time to respond.
  3. Evidence Collection and Hearings – Each side presents arguments, submits evidence, and may attend hearings or conferences.
  4. Legal Review and Decision – The adjudicator reviews the facts and applicable law before issuing a legally binding ruling.
  5. Appeals (if applicable) – In some cases, parties can appeal the decision if they believe legal errors were made.

Who makes the final decision in adjudication?

The final decision in adjudication is made by a neutral legal authority, which varies depending on the type of case and forum. The key decision-makers in adjudication include:

Judges (Judicial Adjudication)

  • In civil and criminal court cases, a judge presides over the proceedings, reviews evidence, and issues a ruling.
  • In jury trials, the jury determines the facts, but the judge still oversees the process and applies the law.
  • Judges have the authority to interpret statutes, assess legal arguments, and issue enforceable judgments.

Hearing Officers or Administrative Law Judges (Administrative Adjudication)

  • In administrative hearings, such as workers’ compensation claims, Social Security disputes, or immigration cases, a hearing officer or administrative law judge (ALJ) makes the final decision.
  • These adjudicators operate within government agencies and follow specific regulatory procedures rather than traditional court processes.

Arbitrators or Tribunal Panels (Private Adjudication)

  • In some legal disputes, adjudication occurs through private arbitration, where an arbitrator or arbitration panel makes a final decision.
  • The parties involved agree to the arbitration process, and binding arbitration decisions are enforceable like court judgments.

The final decision in adjudication depends on the legal setting—judges rule in courts, hearing officers oversee administrative cases, and arbitrators handle private dispute resolution. While some decisions can be appealed, others (like binding arbitration) are final and enforceable.

How long does adjudication take?

The length of the adjudication process varies based on the type of case, jurisdiction, and complexity of legal issues. Below is a more detailed breakdown of average timeframes for different types of adjudication:

Small Civil Claims Adjudication

  • Timeframe: 3 to 6 months
  • Small claims courts typically resolve disputes quickly, as they involve limited evidence and lower monetary amounts.
  • Some cases may settle even faster if mediation or early resolution options are used.

Personal Injury Case Adjudication

  • Timeframe: 1 to 3 years
  • Most personal injury lawsuits go through a pre-trial phase, including discovery, depositions, and negotiations, which can take several months to a year.
  • If no settlement is reached, the case proceeds to trial, which adds another 6 months to 1 year or more, depending on court availability.
  • Complex cases (e.g., medical malpractice or product liability cases) often take longer due to expert testimony and appeals.

Criminal Case Adjudication

  • Timeframe: Several months to several years
  • Misdemeanor cases may be resolved within a few months, especially if the defendant pleads guilty or accepts a plea bargain.
  • Felony cases typically take 1 to 3 years, as they involve more extensive investigations, pre-trial motions, and jury trials.
  • High-profile cases or those involving appeals can extend the process beyond 5 years.

Workers’ Compensation Adjudication

  • Timeframe: 6 months to 2 years
  • Many workers’ comp claims are approved within weeks, but if the claim is disputed or denied, the appeal process can take 6 months to a year.
  • If a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) is needed, the case can extend to 1-2 years before reaching a final decision.

Insurance Claim Dispute Adjudication

  • Timeframe: 6 months to several years
  • Simple policyholder vs. insurer disputes (e.g., car accident claims) can be resolved in 6-12 months.
  • Larger disputes, such as bad faith insurance claims, may take 2+ years, especially if litigation is required.

Administrative Adjudication

  • Timeframe: 3 months to 2 years
  • Government benefit cases (e.g., Social Security Disability appeals) typically take 6 months to 2 years, depending on backlog.
  • Immigration cases often take 1 to 3 years, with some delays extending beyond 5 years due to court congestion.

Factors That Can Delay Adjudication

  • Court backlog: High caseloads in busy jurisdictions lead to delays.
  • Complexity of the case: Cases involving multiple parties, expert witnesses, or appeals take longer.
  • Settlement negotiations: Many cases pause for months while both sides try to reach an agreement.
  • Appeals process: If one party challenges the adjudication decision, the case can extend for several more years.

Who is responsible for making the final decision in an adjudication case?

The decision-maker for adjudication depends on the specific adjudication forum and legal context.

  • Judges – In court cases, judges oversee the legal process and issue rulings.
  • Hearing Officers – In administrative cases, a government-appointed official makes decisions.
  • Arbitrators or Tribunal Panels – In private dispute resolution, neutral third parties can act as adjudicators.

What are the different types of adjudication in law?

  1. Judicial Adjudication – Conducted by courts to resolve civil and criminal disputes.
  2. Administrative Adjudication – Carried out by government agencies for regulatory matters.
  3. Arbitration-Based Adjudication – Private adjudication through contractual arbitration agreements.
  4. Binding vs. Non-Binding Adjudication – Some adjudications issue enforceable rulings, while others provide advisory opinions.

How does adjudication work in civil vs. criminal cases?

  • Civil Adjudication – Resolves disputes between private parties through civil litigation (e.g., personal injury lawsuits, contract disputes). Courts often award damages or injunctive relief.
  • Criminal Adjudication – The government prosecutes individuals accused of crimes. A judge or jury determines guilt, and sentencing follows if convicted.

Both processes follow legal procedures but have different burdens of proof:

  • Civil – Preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not).
  • Criminal – Beyond a reasonable doubt.

What is administrative adjudication?

Administrative adjudication is the resolution of disputes by government agencies or regulatory bodies instead of traditional courts. Examples include:

  • Social Security benefits determinations
  • Immigration hearings
  • Workers’ compensation claims
  • Environmental regulation enforcement

Administrative adjudication allows specialized agencies to handle disputes efficiently, often with more streamlined procedures than formal court trials.

How does adjudication work in personal injury cases?

In personal injury cases, adjudication is the legal process that determines liability and compensation for an injured party. The process typically follows these steps:

  1. Filing a Lawsuit – The injured party (plaintiff) sues the defendant (e.g., another driver, a business, or an insurance company).
  2. Pre-Trial Proceedings – Both sides gather evidence, conduct depositions, and may attempt settlement negotiations.
  3. Court Adjudication – If no settlement is reached, a judge or jury hears the case and determines fault and damages.
  4. Judgment and Compensation – The court issues a legally binding ruling, requiring the defendant or their insurer to pay compensation if the plaintiff wins.

Adjudication in personal injury claims can take months or even years, depending on the case complexity and whether an appeal is filed.

What role does adjudication play in workers’ compensation claims?

Workers’ compensation claims often go through administrative adjudication, where a government agency or workers’ compensation board decides whether an injured employee is entitled to benefits. The process involves:

  1. Filing a Claim – The injured worker submits a claim to their employer’s workers’ comp insurer.
  2. Employer/Insurer Review – The claim is either approved or denied.
  3. Dispute Resolution – If denied, the worker can request a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).
  4. Final Decision – The ALJ reviews medical records, employer arguments, and evidence before issuing a legally binding decision.

This process ensures that workers receive fair compensation for injuries sustained on the job without needing a traditional lawsuit.

Is adjudication used in insurance claim disputes?

Yes, adjudication is often used in insurance disputes, especially when an insurer denies or undervalues a claim. The process may involve:

  • Filing a formal appeal with the insurance company.
  • Mediation or arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method.
  • Litigation if the insurer refuses to pay, where a court will adjudicate whether the policyholder is entitled to compensation.

Insurance adjudication can apply to auto accident claims, property damage disputes, health insurance denials, and disability claims.

What should I do if my case is under adjudication?

If your case is in the adjudication process, here are some key steps to take:

  • Stay in contact with your attorney – They can provide updates and handle legal filings.
  • Follow all court or administrative deadlines – Missing deadlines can harm your case.
  • Gather and maintain evidence – Medical records, contracts, and other documentation can strengthen your claim.
  • Explore settlement options – In some cases, settling before a final ruling can save time and money.
  • Consider lawsuit funding – If your case is taking time, pre-settlement funding can help cover living expenses while you wait for a resolution.

Do I need a lawyer for an adjudication case?

While legal representation is not always required, having a lawyer can significantly improve your chances of success, especially in complex cases.

  • For personal injury cases – An attorney can negotiate settlements, present evidence, and argue in court.
  • For workers’ comp disputes – A lawyer can represent you in hearings and challenge claim denials.
  • For insurance disputes – Legal guidance can ensure that you are not unfairly denied compensation.

If your case involves significant financial stakes, legal technicalities, or resistance from an opposing party, hiring a lawyer is highly recommended.

Does adjudication affect my ability to receive pre-settlement funding?

Adjudication does not automatically prevent you from receiving pre-settlement funding, but it can impact the process depending on your case’s status. Here’s how:

  • If your case is still in adjudication: You may still qualify for pre-settlement funding because funding companies like Express Legal Funding evaluate the strength of your case rather than whether it has been adjudicated yet.
  • If your case has been decided in your favor: You might not need pre-settlement funding, but if the defendant is delaying payment, you could explore post-settlement funding options.
  • If your case was denied through adjudication: You may not be eligible for legal funding unless you are appealing the decision and still have a chance to win compensation.

Since legal funding is based on the likelihood of a favorable outcome, cases with a strong chance of success—whether in court or through an adjudication process—are more likely to qualify.

Yes, Express Legal Funding can help if your case is in adjudication, as long as it meets certain criteria. We specialize in providing risk-free pre-settlement funding to plaintiffs waiting for their cases to resolve. If your personal injury, workers’ compensation, or insurance claim dispute is still ongoing and has strong legal merits, you may be eligible for financial assistance.

Key benefits of working with Express Legal Funding during adjudication include:

  • Fast case evaluation – We work with your attorney to assess your case quickly.
  • No-risk funding – You only repay if you win your case.
  • Financial relief while you wait – Use the funds for essential living expenses, medical bills, or other costs.

If your case is currently under adjudication and you need financial support, apply today for pre-settlement funding with Express Legal Funding.


Get flexible pre-settlement funding at super-fast speeds.

Apply Online

Don't Let Financial Strain From an Injury or Loss Hold You Back!

Our pre-settlement funding can be your lifeline.

Apply Now
for Legal Funding


Sign Up for our Newsletter